Cardiovascular Diabetology

official impact factor 2.72

Open Access Highly Access Editorial

Which is the best lipid-modifying strategy in metabolic syndrome and diabetes: fibrates, statins or both?

Alexander Tenenbaum1,2 and Enrique Z Fisman1,2*

Author Affiliations

1 Cardiac Rehabilitation Institute, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621 Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel

2 Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 69978 Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel

For all author emails, please log on.

Cardiovascular Diabetology 2004, 3:10 doi:10.1186/1475-2840-3-10

Published: 1 December 2004

Abstract

Although less clinical intervention studies have been performed with fibrates than with statins, there are evidences indicating that fibrates may reduce risk of cardiovascular events. The potential clinical benefit of the fenofibrate will be specified by the ongoing Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, which rationale, methods and aims have been just published.

Controlled clinical trials show similar or even greater cardiovascular benefits from statins-based therapy in patient subgroups with diabetes compared with overall study populations. Therefore, statins are the drug of first choice for aggressive lipid lowering actions and reducing risk of coronary artery disease in these patients. However, current therapeutic use of statins as monotherapy is still leaving many patients with mixed atherogenic dyslipidemia at high risk for coronary events. A combination statin/fibrate therapy may be often necessary to control all lipid abnormalities in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetes adequately, since fibrates provide additional important benefits, particularly on triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels. Thus, this combined therapy concentrates on all the components of the mixed dyslipidemia that often occurs in persons with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, and may be expected to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Safety concerns about some fibrates such as gemfibrozil may lead to exaggerate precautions regarding fibrate administration and therefore diminish the use of the seagents. However, other fibrates, such as bezafibrate and fenofibrate appear to be safer and better tolerated. We believe that a proper co-administration of statins and fibrates, selected on basis of their safety, could be more effective in achieving a comprehensive lipid control as compared with monotherapy.

Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus; Dyslipidemia; Fibrates; Metabolic syndrome; Statins