Table 1 |
|
|
Rationale for and potential advantages of early SPC antihypertensive therapy [10,15,16,21] |
|
|
Rationale: |
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Monotherapy is not effective at reaching and maintaining BP goal in most patients |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Each difference of 20 mmHg usual SBP or 10 mmHg usual DBP is associated with a two-fold increase in vascular death |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Using lower doses of each agent reduces the likelihood of adverse events experienced with a single agent used at a higher dose |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Patients with comorbidities, such as renal disease, might benefit from the non-BP-lowering benefits of antihypertensive agents with complementary mechanisms of action |
|
|
|
|
Potential advantages: |
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Simplified treatment regimen, which is particularly relevant in older patients with comorbid diseases requiring complicated polytherapy |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Increased adherence and persistence compared with equivalent free-drug combinations |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Additive effects on BP control of individual components with different, complementary mechanisms of action |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Attenuation of recognised adverse events, such as reduced CCB-induced peripheral oedema and diuretic-induced metabolic changes with RAS blockers |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Lower costs through increased BP reductions |
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure; CCB = calcium channel blocker; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; RAS = renin-angiotensin system; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SPC = single-pill combination |
|
|
Mallat Cardiovascular Diabetology 2012 11:32 doi:10.1186/1475-2840-11-32 |
|